Koji mobilni telefon

[ImbaQQ]

Znam da je kod amera sad na snazi zakon koji zabranjuje operaterima da zakljucavaju telefone. Gledam da uzmem nesto sto cu moci da koristim u inostranstvu takodje, prvenstveno zbog navigacije.

[G!!!]

sta se desava sa androidom 6.0 i nexus 5 telefonim ?

vidim da je google dobro obavio posao, masa telefona ne radi kako treba i imaju razne probleme

Moj otac je valjda greskom pustio da se instalira 6.0 i vise mu ne radi internet/mobile data, sta god stavio 2g/3g mjok nista, a treba mu to jer ima prijatelje iz exjuge sa kojima se cuje tu i tamo

citam po netu, da reset moba ne radi i tako neki predlozi ne daju resenja... ima li neko ideju

[Doca]

zato što slepci puštaju update a da ih pritom zabole karina da detaljno istestiraju i to ne važi samo za android (chrome je najbolji primer toga). meni je n5 prosto počeo da koči posle 6.0.1 apdejta, i svaki put kad pustim taj android apdejt nešto mi se popravi od ranije ali mi se zato stvori novi bag.

što se tiče tvog problema, proveri da li postoji APN za mrežu koju koristi ćale, možda je iz nekog nepoznatog razloga sklonio sve.

[G!!!]

debil sam

izgubila se podesavanja za APN (zapravo tu su al neka leva), jedva sam ih nasao na srpskom meniju :|

izvinte na cimanju

[f4ts0]

to se i meni desilo :)

Inace, sto se tice updateova, n5 radi perfektno meni (realno daleko najbolji telefon posle mog nexusa 2 :) , odusevljen sam i kako radi i kako je prelijep), ali zenin n4 bas baguje. Najnoviji biser je da iz cista mira jutjub prestane da radi, pomaze samo reset fona.

[G!!!]

n5 i npr g2 rade kao zmajevi (n5 kod matorog, g2 sam dao zeni jer ima 16 gb sto je premalo ako se koristi iole )

kakve su to telefoncine u odnosu na premium modele koji su dosli posle njih (ne u smislu da su noviji toliko losi, nego su nedovoljno bolji/brzi/kvalitetniji za razliku u tadasnjoj ceni, a iz danasnje perspektive n5/g2 generacija mobova vredi jos vise!! :P )

[gruja]

mene posle najnovijeg updatea n5 iz cista mira vraca na "welcome page" i moram da ukucam pin kao kada palim telefon :D

Sa druge strane, kevi na s4mini nece da salje poruke, sve joj baguje, a ono, nije standardan matorac korisnik, ne znam koji kurac 

[kblo11c]

Ortak doneo juce meizu pro 5. Ja sam ODUSEVLJEN,oduvao je na antutu testu i note5 i s6 i sve redom. Kvalitet je fenomenalan,kamera sjajna,baterija sa normalnim koriscenjem bez problema skoro 2 dana. Ja imam meizu m2 note i mogu reci da ljudi stvarno prave VRHUNSKE telefone. 

[Elvis J. Kurtovic]

Мени N5 ради одлично, једино смара што после 6.0 апдејта, при куцању, неће да ми да опцију да убацим неку реч у лични речник, него само исправиш и то је то, следећи пут опет смара за исту реч....

[fushi.ryuu]

Ja sam zabo maašumeroo na LG G3 i prezadovoljan sam.

[f4ts0]

Stavi SwiftKey, pere aplikacija :)

Jea!

[mohican]

Taj swiftkey me i odusevljava i nervira van svake mere. Kada mi rec koju sam sigurno koristio milion puta 3 puta za redom prepravlja u nesto drugo ili kada mi promeni padez ili lice reci koju sam pravilno otkucao zapalio bih ga. Ne znam odakle im ideja da ispravnu rec koja se ponavlja menjaju ... ko je smisljao tu logiku ...

[Doca]

što ne staviš da ti na space ostavlja reč takvu kakva je (kako si je ti otkucao), a da ručno klikneš na predlog ako si omašio? malo degenski zvuči ali kad se navikneš (a malo ti treba da se navikneš) kucaš skoro istom brzinom.

[mohican]

Nemam naviku da klikcem gore na reci

[Santa]

Oneplus one zakon.

[Dule_smor]

ne mogu da verujem da su takvi pederi da ne daju ljudima da koriste stare telefone sa starim androidom...ajde sto mi ne radi Viber, nego ne mogu ni google play store da updejtujem normalno sad...nek se nosi jebeno potrosacko drustvo i korporacije koje te teraju da stalno kupujes nove telefone

[Dule_smor]

zato sto sam glup i sjebacu nesto :D

[ImbaQQ]

Ja sam zabo maašumeroo na LG G3 i prezadovoljan sam.

Koliko ti traje baterija? Veoma sam zagrejan za G3 ali dzaba sve ako baterija nije ni za qrac.

[fushi.ryuu]

Pa šta ja znam... Skinem ga ujutru sa punjača, stavim ga uveče na punjač 20-30%. Par poziva, dosta poruka, ponekad vesti, do pola čuke igara... :)

[rbds]

ne mogu da verujem da su takvi pederi da ne daju ljudima da koriste stare telefone sa starim androidom...ajde sto mi ne radi Viber, nego ne mogu ni google play store da updejtujem normalno sad...nek se nosi jebeno potrosacko drustvo i korporacije koje te teraju da stalno kupujes nove telefone

To i moja mama ima problem sa htc sensationom. Jbg, srećom pa nije zahtevniji korisnik, viber joj radi. :D

Enivej, sve pohvale za n5x.

[Dule_smor]

ahaha, sta je ovo, i igorova keva je imala slicne probleme sa fonom kao ja, izgleda da sam postao matora izlapela domacica :D

[mohican]

Postao?

[Lucky]

https://www.apple.com/customer-letter/

A Message to Our Customers
The United States government has demanded that Apple take an unprecedented step which threatens the security of our customers. We oppose this order, which has implications far beyond the legal case at hand. 

This moment calls for public discussion, and we want our customers and people around the country to understand what is at stake.

The Need for Encryption
Smartphones, led by iPhone, have become an essential part of our lives. People use them to store an incredible amount of personal information, from our private conversations to our photos, our music, our notes, our calendars and contacts, our financial information and health data, even where we have been and where we are going.

All that information needs to be protected from hackers and criminals who want to access it, steal it, and use it without our knowledge or permission. Customers expect Apple and other technology companies to do everything in our power to protect their personal information, and at Apple we are deeply committed to safeguarding their data.

Compromising the security of our personal information can ultimately put our personal safety at risk. That is why encryption has become so important to all of us.

For many years, we have used encryption to protect our customers’ personal data because we believe it’s the only way to keep their information safe. We have even put that data out of our own reach, because we believe the contents of your iPhone are none of our business.

The San Bernardino Case
We were shocked and outraged by the deadly act of terrorism in San Bernardino last December. We mourn the loss of life and want justice for all those whose lives were affected. The FBI asked us for help in the days following the attack, and we have worked hard to support the government’s efforts to solve this horrible crime. We have no sympathy for terrorists.

When the FBI has requested data that’s in our possession, we have provided it. Apple complies with valid subpoenas and search warrants, as we have in the San Bernardino case. We have also made Apple engineers available to advise the FBI, and we’ve offered our best ideas on a number of investigative options at their disposal.

We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone.

Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone recovered during the investigation. In the wrong hands, this software — which does not exist today — would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession.

The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.

The Threat to Data Security
Some would argue that building a backdoor for just one iPhone is a simple, clean-cut solution. But it ignores both the basics of digital security and the significance of what the government is demanding in this case.

In today’s digital world, the “key” to an encrypted system is a piece of information that unlocks the data, and it is only as secure as the protections around it. Once the information is known, or a way to bypass the code is revealed, the encryption can be defeated by anyone with that knowledge.

The government suggests this tool could only be used once, on one phone. But that’s simply not true. Once created, the technique could be used over and over again, on any number of devices. In the physical world, it would be the equivalent of a master key, capable of opening hundreds of millions of locks — from restaurants and banks to stores and homes. No reasonable person would find that acceptable.

The government is asking Apple to hack our own users and undermine decades of security advancements that protect our customers — including tens of millions of American citizens — from sophisticated hackers and cybercriminals. The same engineers who built strong encryption into the iPhone to protect our users would, ironically, be ordered to weaken those protections and make our users less safe.

We can find no precedent for an American company being forced to expose its customers to a greater risk of attack. For years, cryptologists and national security experts have been warning against weakening encryption. Doing so would hurt only the well-meaning and law-abiding citizens who rely on companies like Apple to protect their data. Criminals and bad actors will still encrypt, using tools that are readily available to them.

A Dangerous Precedent
Rather than asking for legislative action through Congress, the FBI is proposing an unprecedented use of the All Writs Act of 1789 to justify an expansion of its authority.

The government would have us remove security features and add new capabilities to the operating system, allowing a passcode to be input electronically. This would make it easier to unlock an iPhone by “brute force,” trying thousands or millions of combinations with the speed of a modern computer.

The implications of the government’s demands are chilling. If the government can use the All Writs Act to make it easier to unlock your iPhone, it would have the power to reach into anyone’s device to capture their data. The government could extend this breach of privacy and demand that Apple build surveillance software to intercept your messages, access your health records or financial data, track your location, or even access your phone’s microphone or camera without your knowledge.

Opposing this order is not something we take lightly. We feel we must speak up in the face of what we see as an overreach by the U.S. government.

We are challenging the FBI’s demands with the deepest respect for American democracy and a love of our country. We believe it would be in the best interest of everyone to step back and consider the implications.

While we believe the FBI’s intentions are good, it would be wrong for the government to force us to build a backdoor into our products. And ultimately, we fear that this demand would undermine the very freedoms and liberty our government is meant to protect.

Tim Cook

[togFU]

Jadni oni, borci za pravdu a zle sile su protiv njih

ma lol

[Sa1Nt]

sta nije u redu?