Santa Posted September 26, 2011 Report Share Posted September 26, 2011 ENGAGE! Quote Svakoga dana u svakom pogledu, sve više napredujem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dule_smor Posted September 26, 2011 Report Share Posted September 26, 2011 sad kad vam tomke objasni narodskim jezikom sve ce vam biti jasno! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WuDu Posted September 26, 2011 Report Share Posted September 26, 2011 Zar nisu rekli da je neutrino tip cestice koji ne moze da nosi bilo kakav vid informacije? (cini mi se da sam tako cuo) A ako je tako, onda je nebitno da li se krece brze od svetlosti zar ne? Quote People don't stop playing because they get old, they get old because they stop playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dNte Posted September 26, 2011 Report Share Posted September 26, 2011 (edited) Nebitno? Elaboriraj. A i ne znam zasto prdimo toliko o brzini svetlosti, ako i napravimo objekat koji bi mogao da dostigne neku brzinu priblizno jednaku ali ipak manju od same brzine svetlosti, jebote, pa koliko samo treba da se jedan objekat koji putuje tom brzinom zaustavi? Edited September 26, 2011 by dante_ Quote infidel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sting Posted September 26, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 26, 2011 Ne moze da nosi informaciju? Pa samo to shto se krece je vec samo po sebi informacija. Quote We must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most and that is the indifference of good men ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kal1mero Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Nebitno? Elaboriraj. A i ne znam zasto prdimo toliko o brzini svetlosti, ako i napravimo objekat koji bi mogao da dostigne neku brzinu priblizno jednaku ali ipak manju od same brzine svetlosti, jebote, pa koliko samo treba da se jedan objekat koji putuje tom brzinom zaustavi? pa ako znas da konstruises takav objekat znaces sigurno i kako ces ga zaustavljati :) Quote Нема будућности без истине. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stator Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Mene sada zanima gde ce se ovo proveriti? Jel ima jos neko mesto na svetu koje moze da uradi ovakav eskperiment? Takodje: http://www4.vukajlija.com/var/products/posters/201109/275610/tesla-je-znao-pre-80-.jpg?1316854758[/img Pozdravi drugare sa Vukajlije: http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/26/no-tesla-did-not-predict-faster-than-light-neutrinos/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarcaS take 2 Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 jes pogresio sam, aliajde da probam opet, foton ima po ajnštajnu dualnu prirodu, tako da u principu ima masu zar ne? Ne bas - to znaci da foton je i cestica i talas (to je dualna priroda) - a smatra se da nema masu (i da zato na njega ne deluje ova teorija o beskonacnoj masi). Doduse - koliko i ja znam, neutrino ima masu? Quote https://www.g2a.com/r/barcas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f4ts0 Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 ispravio sam se u narednom postu. svetlost je dualne prirode, talasne i cesticne, gde je foton manifestacija cesticne strukture Quote You may have gone to Cambridge, but I'm an honorary graduate of Starfleet Academy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarcaS take 2 Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Meni se zbagovao browser pa mi je pokazao taj post kao poslednji - bez zle namere :) Quote https://www.g2a.com/r/barcas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f4ts0 Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 ne ne to si uradio sa janom namerom da me diskredituješ pred rur auditorijumomno sad ozbiljno. dakle ako je foton cesticna manifestacija svetlosti, kako onputuje brzinom svetlosti kada ima masu? koja je to beskonacna energija ulozena u svaki foton? da li je slepim bićima brzina zvuka ono što je nama brzina svetlosti? mnogo sjebana ta fizika Quote You may have gone to Cambridge, but I'm an honorary graduate of Starfleet Academy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debeli Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Бог. Quote MORTALIS HOMO AURA PER KHARONE SERVAStyle over subsistenceCrown of Light. Keeper of The Yoda Chamber. I&I, Righteous Army of One. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dule_smor Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 pogotovu kad smrces belo btw, mislim da ste istripovali da treba beskonacna kolicina energije da bi se nesto sa masom ubrzalo do brzine svetlosti, jos kad bi se tomke javio:) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f4ts0 Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Бог. okejovo je baš jak trol na zanimljivoj temi. nije nam bog rekao sta i kako pa da probamo sami ovde da naslutimo Quote You may have gone to Cambridge, but I'm an honorary graduate of Starfleet Academy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shekk Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Tomke ne zna! Čeka da se usaglasi objašnjenje! Quote jebote, smorio si sa kukanjem vise :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sting Posted September 27, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Debeli ostavi Boga van fizike ako Boga znash. Quote We must all fear evil men. But there is another kind of evil which we must fear most and that is the indifference of good men ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dobermann Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 a cek, ti fizicari su VEROVALI da znaju bla truc... sad mi je jasno zasto je to NAUKA ;) btw, supermen je brzi od metka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debeli Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 :)))))) по важећој теорији релативитета, истина је за то да би честице ишле уназад кроз време, мада се не сме изузети из вида референтни систем посматрања те појаве. ако честице путују у круг, као у ЦЕРНу, по важећој физици оне би морале да НЕСТАНУ, јер би отишле у прошлост. давно сам учио физику... Quote MORTALIS HOMO AURA PER KHARONE SERVAStyle over subsistenceCrown of Light. Keeper of The Yoda Chamber. I&I, Righteous Army of One. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dule_smor Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 inside info, prica se da je verovatno pogresan rezultat eksperimenta! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZerBah Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 ma jok, otishle su chestice u proshlost Quote А в чем сила, брат? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trooper Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 btw, mislim da ste istripovali da treba beskonacna kolicina energije da bi se nesto sa masom ubrzalo do brzine svetlosti, jos kad bi se tomke javio:) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity konkretno mislim da ova formula ilustruje to onako laicki gledano, ako v -> c, onda E -> beskonacnosti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BarcaS take 2 Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Foton NEMA masu. Drugo - putovanje u proslost je nemoguce, bez obzirana kretanje brzinom vecom od svetlosti. Trece - to o cemu pricate je moguce samo ako je kretanje ravnomerno, a ne ubrzano - a SVAKO kruzno kretanje je UBRZANO. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_in_special_relativity konkretno mislim da ova formula ilustruje to onako laicki gledano, ako v -> c, onda E -> beskonacnosti Ako je v = c onda E ide u beskonacno. Ako je |v| > |c| onda je taj koren negativan. Quote https://www.g2a.com/r/barcas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~JungleBoY~ Posted September 27, 2011 Report Share Posted September 27, 2011 Ha, i onda dođosmo do kompleksne energije :D To je to, ode fizika u kurac Quote :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f4ts0 Posted September 28, 2011 Report Share Posted September 28, 2011 Foton NEMA masu. ajde da ne guglam pa da ispadam pametan, zar nije obrnuto? tj ima masu jer je cesticna manifestacija svetlosti? Quote You may have gone to Cambridge, but I'm an honorary graduate of Starfleet Academy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Debeli Posted September 28, 2011 Report Share Posted September 28, 2011 (edited) колико ми је остало из физике, мислим да фотон ИМА масу, а да је кретање у прошлост могуће на следећи начин: честица А која би се кретала брзином светлости ОД честице Б би се кретала У ПРОШЛОСТ у односу на референтни систем честице Б, а ако би се кретала КА честици Б, ишла би У БУДУЋНОСТ у односу на референтни систем честице Б. Edited September 28, 2011 by Debeli Quote MORTALIS HOMO AURA PER KHARONE SERVAStyle over subsistenceCrown of Light. Keeper of The Yoda Chamber. I&I, Righteous Army of One. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.