konfuzni Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Zanima me jel neko skoro kupovao iphone u Americi , mislim na 3GS 8 GB jel 99$ kosta sa ugovorom ili bez ugovora , i kada se kupi tamo jel mora ovde da se dekodira/crackuje ili sta vec jel isti fazon kao i sa obicnim telefonima? i koliko se krece cena ovde kod nas za 3GS 8GB vidim 450 E jel to laz neka ili je stvarno tako? Hvala unapred ! Quote I wish that BACKSPACE works in life!. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Nadam se da nisu toliko ludi da samo naprave softverski da je signal jači nego što zaista jeste, to bi bilo baš strašno :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
`Dr. Nick Riviera` Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Confy, 99$ je sa ugovorom na 2 godine i da, mora da se otkljuchava. Cena kod nas je oko 400e za 3GS od 16GB... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peja_ Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 iOS 4.0.1 changelog: * g_DrawSignalStatus(nSignal) changed to g_DrawSignalStatus(nSignal+5) Download Now (123 MB) koliko je meni ovo smesno :))) Quote The thing's hollow — it goes on forever — and — oh my God — it's full of stars! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trooper Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 koliko je meni smešno što neko koristi Hungarian Notation u 2010 godini nhf Vudsi :* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voodoo_ Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 A nije ti smešno što je ovo gola procedura, a ne metod objekta :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trooper Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 ma gde, ne očekujem ništa manje od iOSa nego da bude čist C :) C++ is for pussies :) @topic http://twitter.com/ceoSteveJobs/status/17124017895 jes da je fejk, i da je praktično nemoguće da se desi, ali sve jedno bi bilo lepo da je istina :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 Au za povlaćenje, to će biti baš zajebano... ali ovo je odlično: http://teqnolog.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/cupertino-we-have-a-problem-or-eight/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exile Posted June 27, 2010 Report Share Posted June 27, 2010 iPhone 4: Reinventing the way you hold your phone, again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~JungleBoY~ Posted July 1, 2010 Report Share Posted July 1, 2010 Quote :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 hahaha, ovo za testiranje nije loše :)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
togFU Posted July 2, 2010 Report Share Posted July 2, 2010 Problem - REŠEN :) THAT'S RIGHT NIGGA! YOU'L HAVE NO PROBLEMS HOLDING YOUR FUCKING IPOD SHIT NOW! THIS SHIT COSTS ONLY 99,99$ NIGGA! ORDER NOW! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 fanboj blog: In a beautifully written press release, like a personal letter from a close friend, Apple explains their side of the antenna story. This is a note that will soften even the strongest of hearts. apple: Upon investigation, we were stunned to find that the formula we use to calculate how many bars of signal strength to display is totally wrong. Our formula, in many instances, mistakenly displays 2 more bars than it should for a given signal strength. For example, we sometimes display 4 bars when we should be displaying as few as 2 bars. Users observing a drop of several bars when they grip their iPhone in a certain way are most likely in an area with very weak signal strength, but they don’t know it because we are erroneously displaying 4 or 5 bars. Their big drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in the first place. http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/07/02appleletter.html vudu je bio u pravu, izbaciće update koji drugačije prikazuje jačinu signala. there, we fixed it! ali ovaj deo mi je najgenijalniji: We are also making bars 1, 2 and 3 a bit taller so they will be easier to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Evo još dva zanimljiva infoa. Lik iz Best Buy radnje je napravio ovaj video - na temu iPhone vs HTC Evo. Iako radi u Best Buy-u nije ga nigde pomenuo, ali ga je Best Buy suspendovao. Tražili su da skloni video, on je odbio, a oni sada hoće da ga otpuste :) A druga stvar, još strašnija, je priča oko signala. Izgleda da će se priče odavde, a posebno vudsijeva "formula" obistiniti, jer je Apple, nakon "sto godina" skapirao da im softver za prepoznavanje jačine signala i ispis na ekranu ne radi dobro, pa je prikazivao četiri "kockice" čak i tamo gde bi trebalo da stoje samo dve, pa su ljudi, misleći da imaju signal, zvali, a njega zapravo nije bilo, čime nisu mogli da ostvaruju pozive. Naravno, to će biti ispravljeno u narednom updateu. We sometimes display 4 bars when we should be displaying as few as 2 bars. Users observing a drop of several bars when they grip their iPhone in a certain way are most likely in an area with very weak signal strength, but they don't know it because we are erroneously displaying 4 or 5 bars. Their big drop in bars is because their high bars were never real in the first place. Ceo članak je ovde - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/larry-magid/apple-stunned-that-iphone_b_633969.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peja_ Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 da, procitah, smehotresno zaista :D Users observing a drop of several bars when they grip their iPhone in a certain way are most likely in an area with very weak signal strength koji lol Quote The thing's hollow — it goes on forever — and — oh my God — it's full of stars! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~JungleBoY~ Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 (edited) istini za volju, tu zapravo i ima malo istine, ali samo donekle (da ne pomisli neko da opravdavam idiote :D) edit: da ne budem bas tolko lenj ovde se vidi da je_ogroman_ opseg snaga signala detektovan kao "5 crtica", znaci kao sjajan reception, sto ce reci da, kada ajfon registruje ispod 4 crtice, onda je to vec zapravo los prijem. Ako se uzme da drzanje fona levom rukom skida i do dvadesetak decibela snagu signala koji "ulazi" u fon (tj. dolazi do velikog povecanja impedanse antene jer smo mi ljudi prakticno elektroliti koji hodaju, i sjebava se ceo koncept prilagodjavanja po snazi; ko je isao u neku tehnicku skolu/faks, znace sta to znaci), to znaci da, ako vec tad ajfon ima ispod 4 crtice, snaga signala moze lagano da opadne ispod ovih ~-113dBm i nema softvera koji to moze da popravi, steva prosto nije jaci od prirode dakle, kapiram da mogu da promene ovaj dijagram, i npr., lupam, vec da na -100 dBm kazu kako je to jako los prijem, i onda neko pipne rukom telefon, izgubi poziv i steva kaze "e, niko ti nije kriv, vec si imao los risepshn" Edited July 3, 2010 by Mr. Nobody Quote :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peja_ Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 ali koliko je smesan ovaj video evo vs ip4 :D Quote The thing's hollow — it goes on forever — and — oh my God — it's full of stars! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Dobar je video, ja sam se pitao što je tako retardiran glas, ali onda skapirah da je to (mislim, piše na kraju) sajt koji pretvara tekst u glas, pa je zato "robotizovan". Inače je strava video. A Nobody, sve je to jasno kao dan, ali onda mogu da stave koje god hoće vrednosti i kažu "niste bili u delu sa dobrim signalom". A ameri se već žale na AT&T, baš me zanima kako će podneti da stalno šetaju sa "dve crtice" kroz USofA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iguana Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 zasto se snaga signala na ovom grafiku oznacava u decibelima? Quote It's nice to be good, but it's nothing compared to being bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~JungleBoY~ Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 (edited) pa da, mislim, i ne znam sta bi drugo mogli da urade :D ceo dizajn antene je potpuno retardiran, iako se ovakva antena zapravo bolje ponasa od stare (sto je i mislim logicno, jebote, imas veliki metalni ram oko telefona), ja prosto ne znam ko je njima to pravio a da im nije skrenuo paznju na to da je dovoljno da pipnes taj ram i da dobar deo energije sa antene ode u vidu toplote mozda je i moguce bilo softverski srediti ovo, pod uslovom da postoje u ajfonu promenljivi ss kondezatori pa bi se impedansa mogla adaptirati u realnom vremenu, ali cim oni to ne pominju uopste od toga nista, cenim bice zanimljivo videti posledice ovoga, da li je apple tolki car sa toliko zombija da se izvuce cak i iz ovoga bez vecih posledica, ili pak ne meni je samo divno kolko je ironicno na kraju ispalo ono "this changes everything" :D @ igz, to je standarno oznacivanje elektricnih velicina u telekomunikacijama, prosto receno, inzenjerima je tako zgodnije pri analizi raznih sistema; u ovom slucaju, uzmes snagu signala, podelis je sa 1mW (iz istorijskih razloga je uzeta ta vrednost, a i naravno argument u log funkciji mora biti bezdimenziona velicina) uzmes log od toga i pomnozis sa 10. dakle Ps[dBm] = 10*log(Ps/1mW) zbog toga i velicina nije dB, nego dBm, stvar konvencije to sto je vrednost negativna samo odrazava cinjenicu da se radi o snagama signala koje su manje od 1mW Edited July 3, 2010 by Mr. Nobody Quote :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Naravno da će se izvući, ja uopšte ne vidim toliku "halabuku" oko problema sa antenom. Tj. ona postoji, ali ništa strašno (mada ok, nisam u americi). Strašno je kad ti ne ide pa kao Microsoft kažeš da bataljuješ Kin tri nedelje nakon što si ga lansirao :)) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 Why Did Comedy Central Remove EyePhone Reference from Futurama Online Clip? http://www.maclife.com/article/news/why_did_comedy_central_remove_eyephone_reference_futurama_online_clip Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trooper Posted July 3, 2010 Report Share Posted July 3, 2010 fanboj blog: ja ne verujem da postoje ovakve glave Strašno je kad ti ne ide pa kao Microsoft kažeš da bataljuješ Kin tri nedelje nakon što si ga lansirao :)) Nisam u toku? :) Kin as in Kinect? dovoljno da pipnes taj ram i da dobar deo energije sa antene ode u vidu toplote Jel to u pitanju? Ja sam mislio da se dodirom antene menja geometrija provodnika (produžava se na ruku), tj menja se talasna dužina tj rezonantna frekvencija antene Why Did Comedy Central Remove EyePhone Reference from Futurama Online Clip? http://www.maclife.com/article/news/why_did_comedy_central_remove_eyephone_reference_futurama_online_clip pa EyePhone Reference je tu? :) Možda je bio samo bug pa je ispravljeno? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iguana Posted July 4, 2010 Report Share Posted July 4, 2010 Kin as in Kin One i Kin Two...2 MS telefona (ne windows phone 7 ili uopste win telefona) chija je prodaja prekinuta nakon manje od mesec dana preko mreze Verizon u Americi. Mogu da se kupe sada na eBay-u za jedan cent Quote It's nice to be good, but it's nothing compared to being bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~JungleBoY~ Posted July 4, 2010 Report Share Posted July 4, 2010 @trooper, telo i postane deo antene, ili bar dominantno taj deo ruke, dovoljno da kozni kontakt koji spaja te dve antene potpuno inhibira perfomanse antene, dakle, imas levi ram antene (gsm, umts, sta god), desni ram antene (wifi, gps) i hjumana koji ih spaja, konstrukciju sa znacajno visom impedansom nego sto je predvidjeno i potrebno da bi se postigao optimalni prenos energije, te se i veci deo snage signala gubi tu u vidu toplote takvo je bar moje shvatanje problema :) Quote :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.