domiNus Posted August 14, 2005 Report Share Posted August 14, 2005 Svi ste verovatno chuli i videli na tv-u shta se dogodilo sa avionom... Evo c/p Avion kiparske avio-kompanije Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharky Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Jbg, life goes on. Kako za koga ^^ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nykolla Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 (edited) bedak sranja se desavaju. Edited August 15, 2005 by Nykolla Quote Nije vazna brzina vazan je skill. http://www.klanrur.co.yu/forum/index.php?showtopic=26606 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 nisu valjda opet teroristi.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurgan Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 E stvarno ajde da je nesto neverovatno, ali sad da citam izvestaj iz novina o nesreci na forumu... Bezveze. Laki reaguj i obuzdaj izvestaje o nesrecama... Quote Liberate tutame ex infernis! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZerBah Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Mislim da bi zaista trebalo imati podforum za ovakve loshe stvari... Quote А в чем сила, брат? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Intruder Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 aj agri neshto tipa nesrece itd ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manson Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 (edited) http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.ph...15&pagenumber=1 ima ovde diskusija o tome, nekih 15+ strana evo jednog zanimljivog komentara If pax were freezing this seems to indicate flying without any "packs" in operation..... no pressurisation...... oh dear....... moguce da posada nije ni podesila pritisak ili vec kako se zove pre poletanja, pa kada su dostigli cruising visinu, tih nekih 20tak minuta posle poletanja, kontakt je nestao. ps: a onaj sms je idiotizam, to su novinari izmislili najverovatnije Edited August 15, 2005 by manson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinity Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Bedak.Samo mi nije jasno kako ovi nasi skrnavi dc9-10/boing 737-747 ne padaju.Pu pu pu, ja cesto putujem avionom.Ne mislim da su teroristi u pitanju.Nije mi jasno kako su prvo pilot i kopilot zamrli pa onda polako putnici... Quote Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity! 'Ajde mala bubice, vreme je za pesmicuuu! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manson Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 ovaj helios je bio 737 (-300 mislim, isti koje i jat ima) a jat nema 747 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 b747 nije skrnav.. a i nema ga jat, mada kapiram da je milo kupio desetak komada za mojtenegro, al se zajebao jer ne mogu da mu slete na aerodrome.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manson Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 evo jos par detalja The flight took off from Luton Airport when the tail sustained minor damage after take-off and the pilot had to decide whether to return to Luton for safety reasons or go on to land at Stansted, where it landed safely. In September of the same year, a Helios flight from Larnaca to Luton carrying over 100 passengers was forced to divert to Rhodes due to engine failure. The pilots of the Boeing 737 noticed a problem with the engine around 40 minutes into the 9am flight out of Larnaca and immediately diverted to Rhodes where it landed safely. The Boeing was later given a new engine. Three months later, three passengers from a Helios flight from Warsaw were taken to hospital after the aircraft lost cabin pressure and was forced to make an urgent landing at Larnaca airport. Several more of the 35 passengers and six crew members were treated at First Aid in the airport after the emergency services were mobilised. The reports said that the Helios captain had contacted the Control Tower at Larnaca saying they had lost a significant amount of cabin pressure and that passengers had reported feeling dizzy as the plane was coming in to land. In February this year, A Helios Airways plane was struck by lighting on its way from Larnaca Airport to pick up a number of passengers for a flight to Luton. The Boeing 737was carrying 62 passengers and seven crew members when it left Larnaca for Paphos at around 9am. As the plane was coming in to land, the lightning struck but the landing was not affected. It is not clear whether the Boeing that crashed yesterday was involved with any of the four incidents but reports were rife that the particular plane had had problems in the past, including problems in the aircraft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corey Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Ma kakav pad lovci su oborili avion da ne bi zavšio u Atini pa sad kenjaju kao nesreća. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cell Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Jbt,pa sad je vec jednako opasno sesti u avion kao i otici u Iraq. Quote Neukrotljivi! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manson Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Jbt,pa sad je vec jednako opasno sesti u avion kao i otici u Iraq. ← i to si zakljucio na osnovu jedne nesrece?? avio prevoz je i dalje najbezbeniji, najmanje ljudi godisnje pogine u avio nesrecama. Jedino je malo nezgodno kad padne avion jer je velik body count od jednom ali opet je mali u odnosu na druge prevoze. ako je neka uteha, nisu se mucili Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zEki Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Teroristicki napad...ili neka budaletina... Vec vidim sl. americki film. What if we can control every human bean on the planet. But something happend, something gone wrong. T t t t t t tttt t t t t Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise bla bla bla Quote V Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasuke-kun Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 ja ne volim da se vozim avionima i nikad necu sesti u njih , ne , ne zbog ovoga, nego uopste Quote http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/1829/lol4thlk6.jpg kako pricati sa GM-om Paladins are gay Blizzard loves paladins Therefore, Blizzard is gay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZerBah Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Bah... Avion je neophodan ako zelish da u dogledno vreme vidish neko mesto koje je 1000+ km od tebe. Deshavaju se nesrece, ali ako pogledate realno za godinu dana padne mozda 2-10 putnichkih aviona. Shto je manje od 1% svih aviona koji lete nad nama... Quote А в чем сила, брат? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iguana Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 pre dve nedelje je u torontu airbus a340 prebacio sletnu stazu za 200 metara (neki sistemu su bili, najverovatnije, osteceni udarom groma plus je bilo veoma vetrovito) i zapalio se, na srecu, nakon sto su evakuisani putnici (oko 300 njih) pre nedelju dana pao je u vodama severno od sicilije, italijanski atr 72 koji je leteo od barija do tunisa, i poginulo je oko 20 putnika. a sada josh i ovo. Ali mislim da je glupo da se postavljaju teme o ovom. Quote It's nice to be good, but it's nothing compared to being bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 mansone, jat je i dalje među najbezbednijim kompanijama u svetu, nema potrebe za hejtom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iguana Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 btw koliko sada jat ima operativnih aviona kojima redovno leti? sad sam se setio i one priche o kupovanju novih aviona, koja je bila aktuelna pre jedno 2, 3 godine, kada su otkazali narudzbinu Erbasa i preshli na Boingove (mislim da je bila u pitanju neka nova generacija boinga 737, jer svi noviji su preveliki za potrebe jata, sem mozda 757), zbog kojih su trebali valjda da plate neku kaznu, predvidjenu u ugovoru, od oko 20 miliona dolara. Quote It's nice to be good, but it's nothing compared to being bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manson Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 (edited) mansone, jat je i dalje među najbezbednijim kompanijama u svetu, nema potrebe za hejtom. ← nisam govorio samo o bezbednosti, nego sveukupno, odnos prema putnicima, radu i to i ovo sa heliosom mi sve lici na neku domacinsku politiku :) Edited August 15, 2005 by manson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manson Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 btw koliko sada jat ima operativnih aviona kojima redovno leti? sad sam se setio i one priche o kupovanju novih aviona, koja je bila aktuelna pre jedno 2, 3 godine, kada su otkazali narudzbinu Erbasa i preshli na Boingove (mislim da je bila u pitanju neka nova generacija boinga 737, jer svi noviji su preveliki za potrebe jata, sem mozda 757), zbog kojih su trebali valjda da plate neku kaznu, predvidjenu u ugovoru, od oko 20 miliona dolara. ← imaju nekoliko 737, ne znam tacan broj, dc9 koji ne moze da se leti po EU zbog propisa oko buke... pa leti za cg, afriku... a trebalo je da nabave, valjda iznajme, dva 767 za letove do USA, ali mislim da od toga nema nista Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mitch Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 Po onom ''prospektu'' sto imaju ispred sedista,kazu sledece: Deset komada 737 DC9 kojeg nikad nisam video da leti I jos par onih malih koji takodje slabo lete... Quote Bjukenon Mitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted August 15, 2005 Report Share Posted August 15, 2005 E stvarno ajde da je nesto neverovatno, ali sad da citam izvestaj iz novina o nesreci na forumu... Bezveze. Laki reaguj i obuzdaj izvestaje o nesrecama... Nije mi jasno po kojem osnovu ja moram da reagujem ovde? Apsolutno se ne krshi ni sa jednim pravilom ovog foruma. Drugo, sta ste koji moj otvarali topic ako ne zelite da citate ovakve stvari? Vidis "u smrt bez pilota i kiseonika" i preskocis topic, ides dalje, citas "Paintball" ili "Aj pricajte" i super si. Mozhda bismo i mogli da govorimo o otvaranju posebnog dela klejbezabli za ovakve stvari kada bi zaista postojala potreba za tako necim, ali je nema - postoje dva topica ovakvog tipa svakih par meseci, pa bi i taj forum bio prazan. A otvarati deo foruma u fazonu "e ajde sada ovde postujte sve o pogibijama ali se potrudite da forum drzhite aktivnim" je potpuno retardirano, ne zelim da se korisnici "trkaju" oko toga ko ce da otvori vise topica o smrti. To je zhivot koji nas okruzhuje, nekad siv nekad zhut ... plus se u ovom topicu sada vise prica o bezbednosti aviona i avio kompanijama nego o tom jednom padu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.