Lucky Posted November 23, 2013 Report Share Posted November 23, 2013 Slučajno sam naišao na ovu priču i iskreno za nju do sada nisam čuo niti video bilo šta. A priča je zapravo završetak sudskog procesa u kojem je pomenuta Sofija dobila spor protiv Vahovski braće (brata i sestre) i WB-a i sada čeka isplatu keša. I to za sva tri Matrixa + za Terminatora. Stewart filed her case in 1999, after viewing the Matrix, which she felt had been based on her manuscript, ‘The Third Eye photo,’ copyrighted in 1981. In the mid-eighties Stewart had submitted her manuscript to an ad placed by the Wachowski Brothers, requesting new sci-fi works..According to court documentation, an FBI investigation discovered that more than thirty minutes had been edited from the original film, in an attempt to avoid penalties for copyright infringement. I ovako nešto: The investigation also stated that ‘credible witnesses employed at Warner Brothers came forward, claiming that the executives and lawyers had full knowledge that the work in question did not belong to the Wachowski Brothers.’ These witnesses claimed to have seen Stewart’s original work and that it had been ‘often used during preparation of the motion pictures.’ The defendants tried, on several occasions, to have Stewart’s case dismissed, without success. I naravno, onda ide i pitanje što se do sada tamo malo čulo o svemu: ‘The reason you have not seen any of this in the media is because Warner Brothers parent company is AOL-Time Warner…. this GIANT owns 95 percent of the media… let me give you a clue as to what they own in the media business… New York Times papers/magazines, LA Times papers/magazines, People Magazine, CNN news, Extra, Celebrity Justice, Entertainment Tonight, HBO, New Line Cinema, DreamWorks, Newsweek, Village Roadshow and many, many more! They are not going to report on themselves. They have been suppressing my case for years.’ Evo ovde cele priče - http://www.africanglobe.net/headlines/sophia-stewart-real-creator-matrix-wins-billion-dollar-case Meni ovo deluje baš interesantno, dosta ruši celu koncepciju Vahovskija kao "revolucionara" i šta god. Inače vidim da je vest iz februara a sad je ulinkovana po netu, pa se nadam da nije neki hoax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slađan Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/matrix.asp Quote pljk! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
`Dr. Nick Riviera` Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Matrix 4? :O https://twitter.com/Sophia_Stewart/status/402598842010308608 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corey Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Зар не треба прво да изађу други и трећи део? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Posted November 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/matrix.asp Aha, ok, sad sve to ima više smisla :) Nije baš potpuni hoax, ali je slobodna interpretacija novina koji su onda stvorili potpuno drugačiju sliku. Mada ne mogu da kažem da bi bilo neverovatno :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.