Vladoste Posted February 2, 2006 Report Share Posted February 2, 2006 (edited) Evo mislim da je ovo: » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Reply from 212.62.42.178: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=128 Nadam se da je pomoglo bar malo koristi spoiler za ovakve prikaze. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «[./spoiler] Edited February 2, 2006 by Azdaja Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarabash Posted February 2, 2006 Report Share Posted February 2, 2006 ewww mogao si da stavish spooler >.< ejde uradi ovo: Upali wow, i udju na server, ALT+Tab-uj se i: Start > Run > cmd kucash netstat -n -p tcp e sad, nadjesh gde ima neshto ovako yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:3724 ESTABLISHED ovo yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy je tvoja a xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx je IP wow servera. sad kucash tracert xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > c:\traceroute.txt Kad odradi (moze da potraje par minuta) postuj zadrzaj tog txt file-a, ali stavi [ spooler] ovde paste txt file-a[/ spooler] Quote Watafak! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sa1Nt Posted February 2, 2006 Report Share Posted February 2, 2006 mislish spoiler? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noobchina Posted February 2, 2006 Report Share Posted February 2, 2006 brate pazi ovako kukic je rekao da ce da ih zakolje i ja idem sa tobom cisto zbog pravljenja pizdarija :) ← i gaja je tu cisto da plasi malo svojom figurom [:(!] [:(!] [:(!] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
noobchina Posted February 2, 2006 Report Share Posted February 2, 2006 (edited) vladoste, vidi, imam iskustva sa wirelesom, mnoge stvari su bitne oko toga, ne zaboravi da si ti povezan sa gomilom ljudi u jednom LAN-u, e sad se postavljaju pitanja sta ti ljudi rade, da li je dozvoljeno sherovanje, ko koristi snifere, ko ima trojance, da li ti imas trojanca, ko koristi torrent menadzere kojima moraju da se odrede portovi koje treba da koristi (kod nekih oni pinguju kroz sve moguce portove koji postoje u mrezi, znaci i u lanu).uglavnom prica se svodi na to koliko je opterecen sam LAN u kojem se nalazis, a na kraju krajeva provajder (kao sto je moj) moze da sere i da tera svoju pricu i da te napravi ludim, iako si ti u pravu.znaci postavi njima ova pitanja da vidis sta ce da ti kazu, naravno ocekuj da ce odgovor da bude "ne nema to veze bla, bla, bla...", kao i kod svih drugih. SAMO NIKAKO FIN DA BUDES SA NJIMA!!!! da jednu sam stvar zaboravio da ti kazem, ako zelis da vidis da li ti gubis podatke dovoljno je da pingujes svoj AP, pitaj provajdera koji je IP i proveri ne bi smeo da predje 10, a cak ni 5, ako je signal BAS jak. Edited February 2, 2006 by noobchina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarabash Posted February 3, 2006 Report Share Posted February 3, 2006 mislish spoiler? ← Ma taj ku*atz Quote Watafak! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sa1Nt Posted February 3, 2006 Report Share Posted February 3, 2006 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrayderGame Posted February 6, 2006 Report Share Posted February 6, 2006 Stvarno ne znam sta je problem kod vas.... kod mene je ovako: 2.4 Ghz 768 Ram atm 60GB ISDN 9600XT kartica Ovako znaci sve vuce na najace detalje,antialising na pola ,imam 5-7 MB addonova,na 64Kb radim lagano MC/Ony/ZG/,u BWL na prvog bossa moram da ukljucim 128 Kb,na Vaela je sve opet po starom tako da mogu da se vratim na 64...u AV moram na 128 ali radi fenomenalno lagg 200-300 ali hilove ,spellovi ne kasne...znaci sve ovo radi sa full detaljima... stvarno ne znam sta vam pravi toliki lag.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladoste Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Tarabash uradio sam ono sto si mi rekao i ovo je rezultat. 1 16 ms 31 ms 31 ms loznica.com [212.62.42.2] 2 62 ms 15 ms 31 ms rtr1-2.inffo.net [212.62.42.6] 3 78 ms 46 ms 46 ms 212.200.29.141 4 * * 31 ms 212.200.232.9 5 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms 212.200.232.22 6 46 ms 46 ms 46 ms bpt-b2-pos4-0.telia.net [213.248.96.137] 7 46 ms 77 ms 46 ms bpt-b1-pos2-0.telia.net [213.248.96.93] 8 93 ms 109 ms 93 ms ffm-bb2-pos1-0-0.telia.net [213.248.64.25] 9 293 ms 107 ms 62 ms ffm-b2-pos2-2.telia.net [213.248.64.178] 10 72 ms 46 ms 46 ms ffm-k88-ks53-geth0-2.telia.net [213.248.96.66] 11 90 ms 52 ms 77 ms ffm-k88-ks52-geth0-10.telia.net [213.248.96.58] Imas li sada neku ideju Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormScion Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 cekaj par dana da se istrezni i da ispovraca sva govna kojih se nakljukao ... mada mislim da bi i mohi mogao da ti dade malo njegove bezgranichne pameti ... ^.- Quote Is the destiny of mankind controlled by some transcendental entity or law? Is it like the Hand of God hovering above? At least it is true that man has no control, even over his own will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarabash Posted February 8, 2006 Report Share Posted February 8, 2006 Klasika... one * kod 212.200.232.9 znace da je timeout tu, tj. tu je gubitak paketa. E sad, 212.200.232.9 je Telekomov backbone prema Holandiju ako se ne varam. Jedino shto ti preostaje je da smarash, svog provajdera svaki dan, ceo dan . Oni ce da jave Telekom-u i mozda ti srede stvar kao shto su meni. Shta da ti kazem, osim, srecno. Quote Watafak! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladoste Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 sada sam ponovio precenje i ovo je rezultat : 1 26 ms 109 ms 15 ms loznica.com [212.62.42.2] 2 15 ms 15 ms 15 ms rtr1-2.inffo.net [212.62.42.6] 3 62 ms 77 ms 31 ms 212.200.29.141 4 27 ms 30 ms 23 ms 212.200.232.9 5 22 ms 20 ms 33 ms 212.200.232.22 6 171 ms 30 ms 31 ms bpt-b2-pos4-0.telia.net [213.248.96.137] 7 123 ms 61 ms 28 ms bpt-b1-pos2-0.telia.net [213.248.96.93] 8 93 ms * 62 ms ffm-bb2-pos1-0-0.telia.net [213.248.64.25] 9 55 ms 51 ms 78 ms prs-bb2-pos7-0-0.telia.net [213.248.65.117] 10 61 ms 62 ms 60 ms prs-b2-pos11-0.telia.net [213.248.65.226] 11 54 ms 65 ms 61 ms prs-nant-ks51-geth0-1.telia.net [213.248.98.74] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarabash Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 (edited) Sad kad si uradio ovaj zadnji traceroute, jesi li imao lagu u WoW? Po ovome se ne bi reklo. Ovakvi su i meni odzivi, kad je ping ok. Edited February 13, 2006 by Tarabash Quote Watafak! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladoste Posted February 13, 2006 Report Share Posted February 13, 2006 ne to je jedan od retkih trenutaka kada nisam imao lag. latency je bio oko 400 i bilo je kao sto vidis 3 posle ponoci. Po danu mi je nekih 2000+ i nije moguce igranje. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.