Jump to content

Merenje - Network Latency...

aLti

By aLti
in Rastibudjilizovane klejbezable

 Share

Recommended Posts

Cartman_

Cartman_

Posted
Posted 

Pinging www.l.google.com [209.85.135.103] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.135.103: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=53

Reply from 209.85.135.103: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=53

Reply from 209.85.135.103: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=53

Reply from 209.85.135.103: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=53


Ping statistics for 209.85.135.103:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 38ms, Maximum = 43ms, Average = 40ms

SBB - 3072/256

ONE LOVE, TJM!

www.last.fm/user/uNkindTJM

Link to comment
Share on other sites
f4ts0

f4ts0

Posted
Posted

Mislim da ovo uopshte nema poente jer ne pingujemo svi istu ip adressu i verujem da je ping svima od nekih 40 do 70 shto je nebitno. Mislim da je pametnije da svi pinguju gateway i time ustanovish koliko koja tehnologija ima latency. I opet verujem da je svima od 5 do 20 osim GPRS-a i slichnih tehnologija.

tehnologija nema latency.

Latency zavisi od udaljenosti.

A da je test takav da ne daje valjane rezultate jeste, ali pomozimo rurovcu :)

You may have gone to Cambridge, but I'm an honorary graduate of Starfleet Academy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pilauda

pilauda

Posted
Posted (edited) 

Pinging www.l.google.com [74.125.43.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 74.125.43.104: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=54

Reply from 74.125.43.104: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=54

Reply from 74.125.43.104: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=54

Reply from 74.125.43.104: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=54


Ping statistics for 74.125.43.104:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 46ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 47ms

SezamPro ADSL 4/1

Edited by pilauda
Link to comment
Share on other sites
cali

cali

Posted
Posted (edited) 

Pinging www.l.google.com [74.125.43.105] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=55

Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=55

Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=55

Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=55


Ping statistics for 74.125.43.105:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 52ms, Maximum = 55ms, Average = 53ms[/codebox]

Verat ADSL 4/1, ali sam vezan preko par hopova lokalne mrezhe pa rezultati nisu realna slika provajdera

Edited by cali
Link to comment
Share on other sites
b1oh4zz4Rd

b1oh4zz4Rd

Posted
Posted 

Pinging www.l.google.com [66.102.9.99] with 32 bytes of data:


Reply from 66.102.9.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=51

Reply from 66.102.9.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51

Reply from 66.102.9.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=51

Reply from 66.102.9.99: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=51


Ping statistics for 66.102.9.99:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 61ms

Kablovski net, SBB, 6mbit/s / 384kbit/s

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rev

rev

Posted
Posted (edited) 

Pinging www.l.google.com [209.85.135.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.135.99: bytes=32 time=40ms TTL=53

Reply from 209.85.135.99: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 209.85.135.99: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53

Reply from 209.85.135.99: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=53


Ping statistics for 209.85.135.99:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 40ms, Maximum = 41ms, Average = 40ms

sbb cable 8/0.5mbit.

al stvarno je goga imao poentu, sve sve ali koja je poneta pingovanja ako ne pingujemo svi isti ip zapravo ?

Edited by superbad
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GOd

GOd

Posted
Posted 

Pinging www.l.google.com [66.249.91.104] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.249.91.104: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.249.91.104: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.249.91.104: bytes=32 time=27ms TTL=55

Reply from 66.249.91.104: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=55


Ping statistics for 66.249.91.104:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 24ms, Maximum = 27ms, Average = 26ms

Rogesrs Cable 10/1

Zato shto automatski pingujesh najblizi server. Glupo bi bilo da ja iz Kanade pingujem server u Srbiji.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trooper

Trooper

Posted
Posted 

PING www.l.google.com (209.85.135.147) 56(84) bytes of data.

64 bytes from mu-in-f147.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=46.7 ms

64 bytes from mu-in-f147.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 time=39.9 ms

64 bytes from mu-in-f147.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=3 ttl=245 time=44.3 ms

64 bytes from mu-in-f147.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=4 ttl=245 time=40.6 ms


--- www.l.google.com ping statistics ---

4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3023ms

rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.998/42.933/46.781/2.775 ms

sa routera, kapiram da ti je to relevantan podatak.

Cable, SBB FlatHome, 6144Kbps upstream / 384Kbps downstream

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sa1Nt

Sa1Nt

Posted
Posted 

Pinging www.l.google.com [209.85.227.105] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.227.105: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.227.105: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.227.105: bytes=32 time=120ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.227.105: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=51


Ping statistics for 209.85.227.105:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 120ms, Maximum = 121ms, Average = 120ms

5mbit CYTANET

Link to comment
Share on other sites
C@sper

C@sper

Posted
Posted (edited) 

Pinging www.l.google.com [74.125.43.106] with 32 bytes of data:


Reply from 74.125.43.106: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=52

Reply from 74.125.43.106: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=52

Reply from 74.125.43.106: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=52

Reply from 74.125.43.106: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=52


Ping statistics for 74.125.43.106:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 50ms

Telekom ADSL 8Mbit/512 Kbit

Edited by C@sper

www.polovniracunari.rs

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Trans-Lucky

Trans-Lucky

Posted
Posted 

Pinging www.l.google.com [74.125.39.103] with 32 bytes of data:


Reply from 74.125.39.103: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=53

Reply from 74.125.39.103: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=53

Reply from 74.125.39.103: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=53

Reply from 74.125.39.103: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=53


Ping statistics for 74.125.39.103:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 51ms, Average = 40ms

Cybermedia 384k (1/1) wireless 2.4 GHz.

Svenevideći

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sa1Nt

Sa1Nt

Posted
Posted

pazi što je sranje pinG sa kipra lol

tuga brate, a to je iz ortakove kancelarije... od kuce je malo bolje:

Pinging www.l.google.com [209.85.227.103] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.227.103: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.227.103: bytes=32 time=114ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.227.103: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.227.103: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=51


Ping statistics for 209.85.227.103:

	Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

	Minimum = 112ms, Maximum = 114ms, Average = 113ms

al' svejedno ochaj.. al' net fino radi :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dzontra.volta

dzontra.volta

Posted
Posted

>ping www.google.com

Pinging www.l.google.com [74.125.43.106] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 74.125.43.106: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=51

Reply from 74.125.43.106: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=51

Reply from 74.125.43.106: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=51

Reply from 74.125.43.106: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 74.125.43.106:

Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

Minimum = 55ms, Maximum = 56ms, Average = 55ms

neobee adsl 2mbit

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KadeshiAmbassador

KadeshiAmbassador

Posted
Posted

Wireless 512/256k 2.4 GHz.

Provajder www.gromnet.net

Pinging www.l.google.com [209.85.129.99] with 32 bytes of data:


Reply from 209.85.129.99: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.129.99: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.129.99: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=51

Reply from 209.85.129.99: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=51


Ping statistics for 209.85.129.99:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 50ms, Maximum = 59ms, Average = 54ms

[/codebox]

Mozda bude vise koristi od ovoga:

[codebox]
Pinging www.l.google.com [74.125.43.105] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=96ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=95ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=85ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=93ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=98ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=87ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=80ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=90ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=150ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=83ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=97ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=50
Reply from 74.125.43.105: bytes=32 time=86ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 74.125.43.105:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 150ms, Average = 72ms


Pinging www.l.google.com [209.85.129.103] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=112ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=106ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=110ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=105ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=103ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=51ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=49ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=81ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=56ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=54ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=44ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.129.103: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 209.85.129.103:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 36ms, Maximum = 112ms, Average = 63ms





			
		


		
			

				
					
						

	
	
		

			
				
				

					
				

			
			
			
		

	


					
				
				
			

		

		
			

	

		

		

			

-It is said that the first time Takamatsu saw Judo he was horrified. This was because they bend their backs during their techniques.


		

	


		
	


	

	





	
Link to comment

	
		
	
	
	

	
	
Share on other sites

	

	


	

	

	






	



					
					
					
				
			
			



		

	


	
		

			


	
	

		

	
	
	
	
	
		
	

			
				
				

	
		

			
Join the conversation

			

	
				
					You can post now and register later.
				
				If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
				
			

	
		

	




	
	
		
	
		
	
		
	
	
		
		
	
	

		

		


	
		Guest
	


		

			
				
					
				
					
						
    
							
  • 
								


	
	
	
	

								
							
    • 
						

					
				
					
				
			
			
				
					
						
							
						
						



    

		
		

			
		

		
			
 Reply to this topic...

		
		

			

				
					×
					  Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead
				
			

		

		

			

				  Only 75 emoji are allowed.
			

		

		

			

				×
				  Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead
			

		

		

			

			

		

		

			

				×
				  Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor
			

		

		

			

				×
				  You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.
			

		

		
	

		
	

	

	

		

			×
			
		

		

	



						
					
				
					
				
					
				
			
			
    
				
					
						
					
						
					
						
							
  • 
								

    
	
    

    

								
							
    • 
						
					
				
				
					
  • 

	

    • 
				
			

		

	



			
		

	

	
		

			

				
					


    
          Share
    

    

        
        
            

            
        
    


				
				
                

                


				
			

		

	







	

		
			
				Go to topic listing
			
		
	

	




								


							

							


	

		
		
		
			
			


		
		


	

		
	


	


						

					

					
				

				

			

		

			

				

				
			

		

		


	

		×
		

			
				

					
				

			

			

			

			
		

	






	

		×
		

			
    
				
  • Create New...
    •